Saturday, September 1, 2012

best buy Verilux CleanWave VH01WW4 UV-C Sanitizing Wand on sale

Are you looking for on sale Verilux CleanWave VH01WW4 UV-C Sanitizing Wand,
Amazon.com is selling Verilux CleanWave VH01WW4 UV-C Sanitizing Wand cheap and best offers for Verilux CleanWave VH01WW4 UV-C Sanitizing Wand.




dog allergy to fleas:Verilux CleanWave VH01WW4 UV-C Sanitizing Wand


Customer Review Rank : Review score 3.6 of 5
List Price : $69.95
Price : $47.99 on September 1, 2012
In stock.
dog allergy to fleas review


  • Sanitizing Wand uses powerful ultraviolet light to kill germs and odor causing bacteria on hard surfaces
  • CleanWave technology is chemical free and unlike some household cleaners requires no dwell time and emits no harmful odors
  • Sanitizes electronics, baby toys, counters, bathroom fixtures, pet beds and more
  • Includes an AC adapter/quick-charge battery charger, battery pack. Low-battery warning light featured on Wand
  • 1-year limited warranty (battery pack not covered under warranty)


dog allergy to fleas-Verilux CleanWave VH01WW4 UV-C Sanitizing Wand

Amazon.com
Customer Reviews
Average Customer Review
41 Reviews
5 star:  (12)
4 star:  (15)
3 star:  (3)
2 star:  (6)
1 star:  (5)
 
 
 

237 of 272 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars It's not magic, January 8, 2011
This review is from: Verilux CleanWave VH01WW4 UV-C Sanitizing Wand (Health and Beauty)
The UVC intensity in this Verilux design is so low that for you to truly destroy any microorganisms on a surface you will have to keep it on the surface shining in one spot for over 30 minutes. It does not kill on contact, the intensity of UVC light is too low. In addition, the more you use it, the less UVC is emitted and the bulbs will have to be replaced annually. For you to truly destroy ALL micro organisms (virus, bacteria, mold) on just a pillow surface, you will have to hold the Verilux at every square inch of the pillow for 30 mins at a time. Thus, you would be standing, holding this unit for probably 4-6 hours to truly clean your pillow. You know what's easier, steam cleaning or taking the laundry and washing it. Or using a UVC system design for air treatment installed in your Air Conditioning System. Marketing over hypes the science behind UVC and leads customers to believe in products they shouldn't. This puts a bad name on the UVC products that actually perform, but... Read more
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


52 of 57 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars Bad Battery, June 5, 2011
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Verilux CleanWave VH01WW4 UV-C Sanitizing Wand (Health and Beauty)
The Verilux Cleanwave Sanitizing Wand that was shipped to me was already partially charged. I believe Verilux sent me a returned unit. I plugged the unit in and charged it for the rest of the day and all night before I used it. The first time I used the sanitizing wand it lasted a little over a hour. When the battery is fully charged it will not remain that way for long unless you use the sanitizing wand immediately. If you wait until the next day to use the sanitizing wand it will only last several minutes. The wand will continue to work if you keep it plugged in while you are using it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


28 of 31 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars I Am Skeptical, September 10, 2011
Ernest A. Gudath - See all my reviews
This review is from: Verilux CleanWave VH01WW4 UV-C Sanitizing Wand (Health and Beauty)
The endorsements I read are all anecdotal, and have the ring of endorsements we see for things like magnetic necklaces or hologram bracelets. The 99.9% figure seems particularly fishy. We have all seen scary articles about the number of bacteria on toilet seats, telephones, and the like, so we know that techniques for assaying bacteria populations on surfaces exist. It seems to me that if one is in the business of selling something that kills bacteria on surfaces, one should actually measure its effect with respect to different variables and publish the results. I'd like to see where the 99.9% figure came from, and how the test conditions differed from, say, 99.0% or 90%. As Homer Simpson said, "85% of statistics are made up on the spot. 14% of the people know that." As to my qualifications for making these remarks, I am a retired chemical engineer (MIT '60). At one time in my career I worked ten years in a research lab. One of my specialties there was experiment design.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No


Share your thoughts with other customers:
 See all 41 customer reviews...


*** Terms and Disclaimer *** CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.
This site is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com, endless.com, myhabit.com, smallparts.com, or amazonwireless.com. Some content that appears on this site come from AMAZON Services LLC This content is provided 'as' and are subject to change or remove it at any time.

No comments:

Post a Comment